Supporting Communities Through Improved Regional Connection

Two Alternatives Under Study; Preferred Alternative to Be Announced This Fall

The Mid-States Corridor Project, which is studying an improved highway connection in southern Indiana, has identified two alternatives for further analysis. Alternatives 2B and 3B were shared with the public in fall 2025 in the Screening of Alternatives Report.

Since then, the project team has performed detailed engineering, refined the potential alignments, and conducted environmental studies in coordination with state and federal agencies to better understand impacts and identify ways to reduce them.

This work will lead to the release of a Draft Environmental Impact Statement in fall 2026. At that time, a preferred alternative will be announced, and a public hearing will be held.

The preferred alternative will include the proposed highway alignment, access locations, and preferred roadway type, which was previously identified as an expressway.

Click on a map to see it in greater detail or download it. They are large files and may take a moment to load.

Comment Form

First Name

Last Name

Address

Phone

Which one of the following best describes your interest in the Mid-States Corridor project?

I own property in the 2,000 foot-wide-corridor. I live in the area. I live elsewhere but travel the area frequently. I travel the area infrequently, but I’m interested in the project. I own a business in the project area.

How critical is access to C.R. 400 South / Phoenix Drive?

Why?

How critical is access to C.R. 1100 South?

Why?

Do you have any information about usage, environmental features, or resources that we should consider as we determine a preferred alternative and refine the alignment?

The Mid-States Corridor Project examines an improved highway connection in southern Indiana. The Mid-States Corridor generally follows US 231 from Interstate 64, passing east of Huntingburg and the Jasper area, and extends north to connect to Interstate 69.

Alternative 2B and Alternative 3B have been identified as the primary alignment alternatives to be carried forward for detailed study in the Draft NEPA document, with considerations for variations to the identified alternatives.